I was impressed with how much front loading the teacher
did to prepare the children for the book they were going to be reading. She really seemed to focus on vocabulary and
reading strategies. Inferencing appeared
to be the strategy the children were focusing on during this lesson. The teacher used several strategies to
shelter the lesson. The teacher
explicitly taught the objective. She
went through the vocabulary, representing the words in writing and with
pictures. The teacher focused on
providing synonyms for the words as well as providing words in the students’
home language, when possible. The
narrator recommended previewing the story and using a graphic organizer to
identify what children know about the subject.
I did not see the teacher use this strategy, but I could imagine that it
would be very helpful. I did observe the
teacher guiding the children to use their background knowledge, using sticky
notes to identify the connections.
Children were also encouraged to make predictions about the story.
During the reading, the teacher read the story
aloud. She read slowly and clearly so
the students could follow along. The
students were reminded of the various reading comprehension strategies
suggested during the lesson. Repetition
was used both with concepts and vocabulary.
The children had opportunities to practice making connections throughout
the lesson. The narrator had suggested
giving children appropriate amounts of wait time, but when viewing the video
clips, I noticed the teacher jumping in to answer the questions quickly. I find it difficult to allow for silence
while the children think. My instinct is
to reword the question because they probably didn’t understand since they are
taking so long to respond. When, in
reality, the children are just thinking of the answer and getting their
thoughts in order.
The teacher did have the children review the lesson and
the vocabulary at the end as well as focus on the various reading comprehension
strategies. The children were also given
time in the text to continue to make connections and practice reading.
The teacher obviously spent a lot of time collecting
and implementing many strategies for the students. It was difficult to understand all that the
children were saying, but the children were engaged in the lesson and were
providing answers and discussion items to the conversations. The teacher did not have the children work
with a partner during the clips that I witnessed. This would be a good strategy, and the
narrator alluded to the fact that this does happen in this classroom. I would also suggest that when a student
answers a question, the teacher tries to encourage the child to elaborate a
little. This would also improve language
development and comprehension. I was
definitely able to gleam a few good ideas from this clip. I especially liked the “diary” suggested
during the lesson. What a great way to
organize and review the information learned during the lesson.
Hi Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteI am glad you also noticed all the work that went into this lesson. It really seemed like she was thinking about her students when she was planning! I too hate when there is silence. I find myself not letting the students think through their responses. I feel like if they aren't responding right away, they are not understanding. I am glad you mentioned this and how important it is to let the students have time to think their answer through. Thanks for the reminder! I also liked the "diary" idea. The "confused" post-it section on the board was also a great idea!
Thanks for sharing!
Amberlyn