Blogging Experience:
I would have to say that the blog entries were the most enjoyable portion of the course. I enjoyed reading other's ideas on the various topics and I think this medium was a good way for me to analyze and organize my thoughts. This was my first blogging experience so creating the blog was both challenging and entertaining.
I think blogging is a wonderful way to share ideas and resources. I enjoyed reading others' blog ideas and were able to gain many useful ideas from others. I particularly liked the graphic organizers assignment. I have already used some the graphic organizers others had used to describe the different types of reading materials.
Since blogging, I have started reading other educators blogs. I never really read blogs before, but have found myself seeking out others in the education realm. I have recently started a new job in the Special Education field, and have found several useful and informative blogs to help build my skills in this area.
Jennifer O'Leary
Friday, March 1, 2013
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Blog 9
Blog #9
Both texts (at a kindergarten level) provide pictures to
support learning. Both texts provide
opportunities to practice reading, but the leveled reader is designed for
independent reading of the kindergarteners.
The non-fiction text provides information, but most students access the
information through the pictures or with help from an adult. The reading level for this non-fiction text
is higher than a kindergarten reading level.
I like to think of the two texts as partners, each doing a
different job. The non-fiction text
extends the learning provided in the level reader. The level reader focuses on the reading
concepts and uses dinosaurs to make connections. Children learn a few facts during the leveled
reader, but I have found that children have a high interest in dinosaurs and
wish to learn more. That is where the
non-fiction text comes in to play. The
non-fiction text really focuses on the facts about dinosaurs.
I truly believe that each text has many opportunities for
learner and children need to learn how to access information from each of the
genres. As children progress through
school, they will be expected to be able to read and understand both fiction
and non-fiction text, but they usually need help learning how to access the
information. One way to provide this
learning is to provide many opportunities and expose children to the different
genres.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Blog #8
I was impressed with how much front loading the teacher
did to prepare the children for the book they were going to be reading. She really seemed to focus on vocabulary and
reading strategies. Inferencing appeared
to be the strategy the children were focusing on during this lesson. The teacher used several strategies to
shelter the lesson. The teacher
explicitly taught the objective. She
went through the vocabulary, representing the words in writing and with
pictures. The teacher focused on
providing synonyms for the words as well as providing words in the students’
home language, when possible. The
narrator recommended previewing the story and using a graphic organizer to
identify what children know about the subject.
I did not see the teacher use this strategy, but I could imagine that it
would be very helpful. I did observe the
teacher guiding the children to use their background knowledge, using sticky
notes to identify the connections.
Children were also encouraged to make predictions about the story.
During the reading, the teacher read the story
aloud. She read slowly and clearly so
the students could follow along. The
students were reminded of the various reading comprehension strategies
suggested during the lesson. Repetition
was used both with concepts and vocabulary.
The children had opportunities to practice making connections throughout
the lesson. The narrator had suggested
giving children appropriate amounts of wait time, but when viewing the video
clips, I noticed the teacher jumping in to answer the questions quickly. I find it difficult to allow for silence
while the children think. My instinct is
to reword the question because they probably didn’t understand since they are
taking so long to respond. When, in
reality, the children are just thinking of the answer and getting their
thoughts in order.
The teacher did have the children review the lesson and
the vocabulary at the end as well as focus on the various reading comprehension
strategies. The children were also given
time in the text to continue to make connections and practice reading.
The teacher obviously spent a lot of time collecting
and implementing many strategies for the students. It was difficult to understand all that the
children were saying, but the children were engaged in the lesson and were
providing answers and discussion items to the conversations. The teacher did not have the children work
with a partner during the clips that I witnessed. This would be a good strategy, and the
narrator alluded to the fact that this does happen in this classroom. I would also suggest that when a student
answers a question, the teacher tries to encourage the child to elaborate a
little. This would also improve language
development and comprehension. I was
definitely able to gleam a few good ideas from this clip. I especially liked the “diary” suggested
during the lesson. What a great way to
organize and review the information learned during the lesson.Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Blog #7
Blog #7 RUNNING RECORD MISCUES ANALYSIS
I observed an ESL class in an elementary school. The majority of the children in the classroom
spoke Spanish as their home language.
There was one girl who spoke Russian and one boy who spoke a Chinese
dialect. I observed a reading
lesson. The class is taught in English,
with many visual and auditory cues given as needed. The children have attended this school for
over a year, so they are becoming much more comfortable with the English
language, but as I observed, I was able to identify a few errors. I noticed meaning errors, syntax errors, and
visual cue errors.
I noticed that overall, the children made more errors in syntax
and visual cues than they did in meaning.
I noticed that the Chinese speaking child made several syntactic errors,
mostly with tenses. When reading, the
child would tend to read words in the present tense. I noticed that this child struggled with
tenses even when speaking. The Spanish
speaking students struggled more with the visual errors. I noticed that words that began with “B” or
“D” were often misspoken. I could
attribute this to the difference in the pronunciation of letters in the Spanish
alphabet and that of the English alphabet.
Words with vowel teams and diphthongs were also more difficult for the
children to sound out. I would expect this error from most children at their
age (1st- 2nd grade).
One of the more fluent speaking
students in the class made some meaning errors.
The child would miscall a word in the sentence, but the sentence would
still make sense. During the lesson, the
children were reading a story about owls.
The child miscalled the word owl, and replaced it with the word
bird. The book did not have pictures, so
the child had created enough meaning to understand what the story was
about.
Because most of the errors were syntactic or visual in nature,
I would wonder if the children are making much meaning of what they are
reading. I would not worry too much
about the child making meaning errors.
The child is reading with errors, but the errors are not changing the
meaning of the story. In fact, the child
is gaining enough meaning from the words, that that child is able to switch
words and still keep the meaning the same.
As the teacher, I would focus on helping the children making visual errors. These children are at the basic level of
sounding out words. Because the children
are so focused on decoding, and still making errors, I would imagine that very
little comprehension is taking place. As
the teacher, I would start teaching strategies such as skip and reread, rather
than sound out each sound. If the child
can skip the word they don’t know and gain enough meaning to fill in the gap,
they will gain the needed comprehension.
After they have an idea of what the word should be, they can go back and
figure the word out. For example, “The
_____ rises in the east and warms the earth during the day”. Even without the word in the sentence, most
students could figure out what was missing based on the meaning of the
sentence. I would recommend the teacher
focus on comprehension strategies rather than spending so much time trying to
decode each and every word.
For the students making syntax errors, I would repeat what
they had said, correctly. This way the
children are hearing the correct usage of the verb tenses. I find this error hard to correct, but I find
setting a good verbal example to be one of the most useful strategies. For example, I heard one child read “The owl
flewed over the field looking for food”.
I would have repeated, “Oh so the owl FLEW over the field . . . What did
the owl do?” The trick is to be
consistent, but not make a big deal about the mistake. The child needs to hear the write tense
several times before it clicks.
Overall, the teacher had some really good strategies in
place. I admired the fact that all
children in the class were participating, and even though they were all making
different errors, she was able to generalize and support the children as
needed. My biggest recommendation would
be to focus more on comprehension. I
felt the children were focused on reading the words correctly, but when the
teacher was asking questions about the reading, all the children
struggled. I still believe that decoding
is very important, but I think comprehension is the ultimate goal, and needs to
be addressed at an early age as well.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Blog #6
|
Directions:
Label each activity (L) for learning/word recognition or (A) for
acquisition/sociopsycholingiustic view. Some activities can have both labels.
Be prepared to explain your choices.
|
|
|
The students:
|
The teacher:
|
|
L
Look up words in the dictionary to write definitions.
A
Make a Venn diagram to compare two stories
L
Practice sounding out words
L/A
Read in round-robin fashion
A
Correct peers when they make a mistake during reading
L
Identify words on a big book page that start with the same sound
A
Group cards with classmates’ names by a criterion on such as first or last
letter
A
Write rhyming poetry and then discuss different spellings for the same word
A
Ask the teacher how to spell any word they don’t know
A Read a language experience story they have created with the
teacher
A
Work in pairs to arrange words from a familiar chant into sentences
L
Divide words into syllables
L/A
On a worksheet, draw a line from each word to the picture that starts with
the same sound
A
Make alphabet books on different topics
|
L/A
Pre-teaches vocabulary
A
Does a shared reading with a big book
A
Makes sure that students read only books that fit their level
L
Has students segment words into phonemes
A
Writes words the students dictate for a story and has students help with the
spelling of difficult words
A
Asks students to look around the room and find words starting with a certain
letter
L/A
Uses decodable text
A
Sets aside time for SSR each day
L/A
Teaches Latin and Greek roots
A
Has students meet in literature circles
L
Conducts phonics drills
L/A
Chooses predictable texts
A Teaches
students different comprehension strategies
A
Does a picture walk of a new book
L/A
Uses a variety of worksheets to teach different skills
|
Learning vs. acquisition
is an interesting dynamic. I found
myself determining a learning activity as one that a child would need to be
able to move to the next stage of acquiring language skills. When completing the task, it was easy to
assign the titles of learning and acquisition when I was thinking of young
children, but as I tried to make myself think of older children, the task took
on a different role. I found that
activities that were labeled acquisition activities were activities that would
need some scaffolding or primer activities (the learning activities). The activities that were labeled both
learning and acquisition were done so because I felt that the activities could
be learning activities if a child was at a beginning stage. Children could be simply identifying sounds
or words. If the activity was extended
(it was difficult to tell what all was included in the activity), the child
could then be acquiring information or language from the activity.
I believe a strong
foundation is key to sustained learning.
I would focus on language activities initially, and as students began to
develop the necessary skills, I would then move to more acquisition
activities. I do believe that a good
teacher should be able to take any activity and adjust as needed for the students. Therefore, just about any activity could be a
learning activity or an acquisition activity.
The trick is to know where your children are and how best to guide them
to the next level. Some children may be
able to recognize letter sounds but still have a difficult time naming the
letters. Because every child is unique,
we as teachers need to plan activities that can build the necessary language
skills so that all children can focus on the acquisition of both language and knowledge.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Blog #5
Blog Entry #5
The first book I reviewed was titled “Guess How Much I Love You”, by Sam McBratney. I identified four areas that might affect comprehension. The first area that I thought would affect the comprehension of this story is knowledge of the vocabulary. In this story, I feel that children will need to know what a hare is. Most children are familiar with a rabbit, but may not know that a hare is very similar to a rabbit. Children may also not be familiar with the word lane. Lane is a path or road. Finally, children may not be familiar with the word tumbled. Tumbled means to turn over or roll over and fall down. I would allow children to practice these words, act them out and come up with examples and non-examples of the words.
The next aspect of this story that may affect comprehension would be to have knowledge of prepositions. Prepositions can be very confusing for English language learners. I have found the best way to teach prepositions is to have children practice by acting out the motions. For this story, I would focus on up/down, near/far, over/under, in/out and across.
I would also focus on teaching children how to identify the names of the characters. Most early elementary picture books have characters with one name such as Sam, Owen, Rodney, etc. The main characters in this story each have three words in their names so this may be confusing to ELL students. The names do give clues to what the characters are like and help to describe them. The main characters are Big Nutbrown Hare and Little Nutbrown Hare. In their names, the reader can determine the size of the character, the color of the character and what animal the character is. By teaching children to pick up clues as they read, they will be able to create a clearer picture of what the story is about.
I would spend a few minutes helping children to understand abstract thoughts such as love and wish. These concepts are more challenging to teach ELL because these are concepts that are not easily represented with visual aids and pictures. Love and wishing are two main themes in this story, so it would be important for children to have an understanding of what these two words mean. Children would be given many examples of the two words and given an opportunity to make meaning of these words for themselves.
The second book I reviewed was titled “Stone Soup”, by Marcia Brown. The first area in the book that I would focus on teaching would be to build some background knowledge of the time period and livelihoods of the characters in the book. I would focus on identifying what soldiers do and what wars are. I would also identify how a village is different from a city. I would identify what it means to have to harvest all of your food as opposed to going to the grocery store.
Another dominate concept in this story is the concept of ordinal numbers and phrases. Throughout the book, children will encounter words such as 1st, 2nd and 3rd. The story also uses ordinal phrases such as first, next and last. I could help children identify these words by giving examples and allowing children to put various items and topics in order using the ordinal numbers and phrases.
This story has a strong lesson or moral imbedded within the story. I would help children identify the conceptual thinking of ideas such as team work and generosity. These two terms can be challenging and cultural views may differ on the definition and importance of these ideas. When stories are teaching morals, teachers have to be knowledgeable of how the different cultures may have different feelings toward stories that teach moral issues.
I believe an understanding of vocabulary is vital to understand any story. This story has many levels of vocabulary, but a large portion of the story is focused around the characters making soup and the various ingredients they use. I would spend time teaching the various food vocabulary words. The story uses several food items that children may not be familiar with such as carrots, cabbage, barley, potatoes, beef, and milk. Children will be able to follow the series of events in the story if they have a basic understanding of the food used in the story. I would use pictures to help the children identify the various foods.
Breaking apart the stories into the various areas where children might struggle will help to allow for understanding for all children. As I was developing the areas and strategies I would use, I realized that these strategies would benefit any child, not just ELL students. I find myself overestimating how many words my students truly understand so I would really focus on building vocabulary. If the strategy builds comprehension, all children will benefit from the time it takes to teach the strategy.
The first book I reviewed was titled “Guess How Much I Love You”, by Sam McBratney. I identified four areas that might affect comprehension. The first area that I thought would affect the comprehension of this story is knowledge of the vocabulary. In this story, I feel that children will need to know what a hare is. Most children are familiar with a rabbit, but may not know that a hare is very similar to a rabbit. Children may also not be familiar with the word lane. Lane is a path or road. Finally, children may not be familiar with the word tumbled. Tumbled means to turn over or roll over and fall down. I would allow children to practice these words, act them out and come up with examples and non-examples of the words.
The next aspect of this story that may affect comprehension would be to have knowledge of prepositions. Prepositions can be very confusing for English language learners. I have found the best way to teach prepositions is to have children practice by acting out the motions. For this story, I would focus on up/down, near/far, over/under, in/out and across.
I would also focus on teaching children how to identify the names of the characters. Most early elementary picture books have characters with one name such as Sam, Owen, Rodney, etc. The main characters in this story each have three words in their names so this may be confusing to ELL students. The names do give clues to what the characters are like and help to describe them. The main characters are Big Nutbrown Hare and Little Nutbrown Hare. In their names, the reader can determine the size of the character, the color of the character and what animal the character is. By teaching children to pick up clues as they read, they will be able to create a clearer picture of what the story is about.
I would spend a few minutes helping children to understand abstract thoughts such as love and wish. These concepts are more challenging to teach ELL because these are concepts that are not easily represented with visual aids and pictures. Love and wishing are two main themes in this story, so it would be important for children to have an understanding of what these two words mean. Children would be given many examples of the two words and given an opportunity to make meaning of these words for themselves.
The second book I reviewed was titled “Stone Soup”, by Marcia Brown. The first area in the book that I would focus on teaching would be to build some background knowledge of the time period and livelihoods of the characters in the book. I would focus on identifying what soldiers do and what wars are. I would also identify how a village is different from a city. I would identify what it means to have to harvest all of your food as opposed to going to the grocery store.
Another dominate concept in this story is the concept of ordinal numbers and phrases. Throughout the book, children will encounter words such as 1st, 2nd and 3rd. The story also uses ordinal phrases such as first, next and last. I could help children identify these words by giving examples and allowing children to put various items and topics in order using the ordinal numbers and phrases.
This story has a strong lesson or moral imbedded within the story. I would help children identify the conceptual thinking of ideas such as team work and generosity. These two terms can be challenging and cultural views may differ on the definition and importance of these ideas. When stories are teaching morals, teachers have to be knowledgeable of how the different cultures may have different feelings toward stories that teach moral issues.
I believe an understanding of vocabulary is vital to understand any story. This story has many levels of vocabulary, but a large portion of the story is focused around the characters making soup and the various ingredients they use. I would spend time teaching the various food vocabulary words. The story uses several food items that children may not be familiar with such as carrots, cabbage, barley, potatoes, beef, and milk. Children will be able to follow the series of events in the story if they have a basic understanding of the food used in the story. I would use pictures to help the children identify the various foods.
Breaking apart the stories into the various areas where children might struggle will help to allow for understanding for all children. As I was developing the areas and strategies I would use, I realized that these strategies would benefit any child, not just ELL students. I find myself overestimating how many words my students truly understand so I would really focus on building vocabulary. If the strategy builds comprehension, all children will benefit from the time it takes to teach the strategy.
Blog #4
Blog
#4
I then moved to an adult-nonfiction text entitled
“Historias de Mexico”. I found this text
much less frustrating to read. I used
the same strategy as I had used in the first story I read, such as finding
Spanish words that look like English words and using punctuation. Because this text was nonfiction, the
information included a lot of dates and places where events took place. I was also able to make sense of some of this
book because there were pictures and diagrams to go along with the text. With the combination of a few words I
recognized and the diagrams/pictures, I was able to get a general gist of the
information. I could not read the
information word for word, but could give general details from the information. I could move through the information in this
story much more quickly.
I also tried to make sense of a children’s novel. I even chose a book I was familiar with, but
was written in Spanish, “El Leon, la Bruja y el Ropero” or “The Lion, the
Witch, and the Wardrobe”. It amazed me
how much I rely on the words for meaning.
I have probably read this book at least 8 times, but when I was faced
with trying to make meaning of the story when it was written in Spanish, I had
a really hard time. I could recognize
the characters and pick out a few words, but the details were lost as I was
trying to translate the story back into English. Trying to make sense of a story I was
supposed to know was very frustrating, probably the most frustrating of all the
books I looked at. I used the strategies
listed above but couldn’t make sense of much.
The story has very few pictures, so the pictures could not give me a lot
of information. I tried to fill in the
holes of the story that I could remember with the words I could pick out, but I
knew I was missing a lot of the story. I
can only imagine how much information our ELL learners are missing when they
are reading text completely in English!
The last book I looked at was a popular picture book
“Owen”. I have never read the story
before, but found it easy to make meaning of the story. I used the pictures predominantly, but once I
was able to put the story in order, I went back and tried to make meaning of
the words. The pictures played a huge
part in my ability to understand what the story was about. I would be able to retell the story in my own
words if needed. I think that pictures
are a valuable tool for children learning another language, but I would not
want the child to depend solely on the pictures. I do believe it is important to work with the
text as well so that a true meaning is obtained and a connection and meaning of
the words can be gathered.
The strategies I used included:
·
Matching Spanish
words to English words (look-a-likes)· Using diagrams and pictures for nonfiction text
· Reading stories that are familiar
· Using pictures in picture books
· Taking the stories one page, or even one sentence at a time
· I had to take several breaks to avoid becoming completely frustrated
· I found myself reading aloud much of the time
Friday, January 11, 2013
Blog #3
Oral language greatly affects the reading process. As children begin to develop oral language,
they begin to make rules for language. I
found the reading this week very interesting in that it stated that all
children are wired for language, it does not matter what language they are
exposed to. I have worked with many
children, both ELL learners and children with limited language exposure. These children struggle with reading because
they do not have the vocabulary to comprehend what is being read. When children have a strong vocabulary, they
are able to make connections to stories.
The children are also able to build on their vocabulary as they read and
can make inferences about what a word might mean. A child may not know what a German Shepard
is, but based on the sentence, the child would be able to figure out that the
sentence is about a dog. Because the
child has an understanding of what a dog is, they are also able to have an
understanding of a German Shepard.
Oral language development occurs long before reading skills
are developed. Oral language is the
foundation of understanding. I have read
several studies that track the quantity and quality of language children are
exposed to. The studies I have read, by
Ruby Pane, have found that children in poverty are exposed to less language and
the quality of language is poor. As
these children enter school, they tend to struggle more with reading. The lack of exposure to language can really
affect reading.
When I recall my first reading experiences, I feel like the
time my parents spent reading to me made the biggest difference in my ability
to read. I remember reading and sounding
out words. Because I had heard the word
used before, I was able to gain meaning of the story. Listening to language and being able to use
language will help children build the necessary skills to develop reading
comprehension.
Blog #2
Entry
#2: Reflect
on the writing instruction you have received. Which view of writing described
in this chapter corresponds most closely to your experiences?
As a child in elementary school, I remember spending a great
deal of time writing stories. Creative
writing was the emphasis. The
fundamentals of writing were taught in isolation, not included in the story
writing sessions. Writing was done
independently, with only a topic presented by the teacher. As I continued into middle school and high
school, the emphasis shifted from creative writing to report writing. Writing structure was taught explicitly and
little deviation from the five paragraph report was accepted. I believe I was taught writing using the
acquisition view during the elementary years.
The conventions of writing were not the focus and teachers graded based
on ideas, creativity and organization of writing rather than the conventions
and structure of writing. As I moved
into middle and high school, I believe the instruction became more like that described
in the learning view. As I got older,
the writing instruction became much more intentional and directive. Writing conventions were highly emphasized
and taught.
I feel like I have struggled as a writer for most of my
academic career. I believe that if I had
reversed the teaching styles so that I was getting the direct, explicit writing
instruction in elementary school and a greater focus on the writing process as
a middle school and high school student, I would have a stronger writing
foundation. In the time I have spent
teaching writing, I have found that most students need the direct, explicit
instruction for writing. There are many
steps and processes involved in creating a good piece of writing. I have found that students are the most
successful writers when they are given instruction about writing, starting with
the basic concepts and building to a point when students can put together well
written, grammatically correct sentences.
As students establish a strong foundation for writing, I could then
build on the various writing processes and styles. As with any topic a student is learning, I
believe that a strong foundation is the key to success, and writing in no
exception.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Blog #1
Entry #1: Discuss with another teacher, his/her philosophies
about teaching literacy. (This can be a casual, short conversation with the
purpose of gathering another teacher’s philosophies on his/her practices of
teaching literacy.)
I chose to discuss
the philosophies about teaching literacy with a 2nd grade
teacher. She felt that literacy if the
foundation to all other learning, in that, you need a good foundation in
literacy to be able to access other information from other subjects. She believes that children spend the first
few years of school learning to read but the remainder of their school careers
are spent reading to learn. This teacher
had previously taught 5th grade and had many children in the
classroom that struggled in all academic areas because they lacked a strong
literacy background.
This teacher has a
very linear approach to teaching literacy.
She believes in developing a strong foundation for children. Even in 2nd grade, she spends a
great deal of time on phonemic awareness activities as well as phonics. She believes that children will have greater
success in reading in the future if they have a strong foundation when they are
young. Her school uses a reading
assessment program DIBELs to determine the acquisition of phonemic awareness
skills, phonics, decoding, and comprehension.
The teacher I interviewed felt that comprehension was the ultimate goal
when teaching literacy because once a child can comprehend what they are
reading; they can learn from the material and enjoy the material.
The teacher I
interviewed believes reading should be an activity to enjoy for a lifetime, but
children need the basic skills to be able to read. Once these skills are developed, children can
really begin to explore genres and decide what type of reader they will be for
the future. This teacher feels her role
as a 2nd grade teacher is to continue to build the skills and start
to help children explore reading as a means of gaining information and for
pleasure.
There are many
components to this teacher’s philosophy that I found interesting and
enlightening. I agree with her statement
that children learn to read and then read to learn. I also agree that a strong foundation is
important to reading, as with many other skills, to be successful later down the
road. Literacy is such a complex topic
and there are so many components to literacy that I can see why she has chosen
to break it down into the various components.
I was glad to hear her say that her ultimate goal is to help children
develop a love of reading for entertainment value. I do worry sometimes that schools get so
systematic about teaching literacy, that the “fun” of reading can be lost. As an adult, reading is an enjoyable pastime
and this started when I was much younger.
I would like to think that children are developing strong literacy
skills and also a strong desire to read for fun and knowledge.
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Welcome
Hello,
I just wanted to welcome everyone to my blog. Throughout the next 8 weeks I hope to explore literacy for the diverse learner. Stay tuned as I share my learning and aha moments.
Thanks,
Jennifer
I just wanted to welcome everyone to my blog. Throughout the next 8 weeks I hope to explore literacy for the diverse learner. Stay tuned as I share my learning and aha moments.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

